Dr. Thomas Keller

We introduce transition-counting constraints as a principled tool to formalize constraints that must hold in every solution of a transition system. We then show how to obtain transition landmark constraints from abstraction cuts. Transition landmarks dominate operator landmarks in theory but require solving a linear program that is prohibitively large in practice. We compare different constraints that project away transition-counting variables and then further relax the constraint. For one important special case, we provide a lossless projection. We finally discuss efficient data structures to derive cuts from abstractions and store them in a way that avoids repeated computation in every state. We compare the resulting heuristics both theoretically and on benchmarks from the international planning competition.

The merge-and-shrink framework is a powerful tool for computing abstraction heuristics for optimal classical planning. Merging is one of its name-giving transformations. It entails computing the product of two factors of a factored transition system. To decide which two factors to merge, the framework uses a merge strategy. While there exist many merge strategies, it is generally unclear what constitutes a strong merge strategy, and a previous analysis shows that there is still lots of room for improvement with existing merge strategies. In this paper, we devise a new scoring function for score-based merge strategies based on answering the question whether merging two factors has any benefits over computing saturated cost partitioning heuristics over the factors instead. Our experimental evaluation shows that our new merge strategy achieves state-of-the-art performance on IPC benchmarks.

The computation of high-quality landmarks and orderings for heuristic state-space search is often prohibitively expensive to be performed in every generated state. Computing information only for the initial state and progressing it from every state to its successors is a successful alternative, exploited for example in classical planning by the LAMA planner. We propose a general framework for using landmarks in any kind of best-first search. Its core component, the progression function, uses orderings and search history to determine which landmarks must still be achieved. We show that the progression function that is used in LAMA infers invalid information in the presence of reasonable orderings. We define a sound progression function that allows to exploit reasonable orderings in cost-optimal planning and show empirically that our new progression function is beneficial both in satisficing and optimal planning.

Previous work introduced the concept of progress states. Once greedy best-first search expanded a progress state, it expands only states with lower heuristic values. Current methods identify progress states for a single task and after a solution for the task is found. We introduce a novel approach which learns for a classical planning domain a description logic formula to characterize all its progress states. This formula can be used during future searches. We present a first use case which exploits the learned formulas: During search we break ties in favor of progress states. This often significantly reduces the search effort.

In classical planning, cost partitioning is a powerful method which allows to combine multiple admissible heuristics while retaining an admissible bound. In this paper, we extend the theory of cost partitioning to probabilistic planning by generalizing from deterministic transition systems to stochastic shortest path problems (SSPs). We show that fundamental results related to cost partitioning still hold in our extended theory. We also investigate how to optimally partition costs for a large class of abstraction heuristics for SSPs. Lastly, we analyze occupation measure heuristics for SSPs as well as the theory of approximate linear programming for reward-oriented Markov decision processes. All of these fit our framework and can be seen as cost-partitioned heuristics.

Landmarks of a planning task denote properties that must be satisfied by all plans. Existing landmark heuristics exploit that each landmark must be achieved at least once. However, if the orderings between the landmarks induce cyclic dependencies, one of the landmarks in each cycle must be achieved an additional time. We propose two novel heuristics for cost-optimal planning that consider cyclic dependencies between landmarks in addition to the cost for achieving all landmarks once. We show that our heuristics dominate the minimum hitting set solution over any set of landmarks as well as h + if all delete-relaxation landmarks are considered. An experimental evaluation on benchmarks from the International Planning Competition shows that exploiting cyclic dependencies can lead to improved heuristics.

Optimal cost partitioning can produce high quality heuristic estimates even from small abstractions. It can be computed with a linear program (LP) but the size of this LP often makes this impractical. Recent work used Lagrangian decomposition to speed up the computation. Here we use a different decomposition technique called Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition to tackle the problem. This gives new insights into optimal cost partitioning and has several advantages over Lagrangian decomposition: our method detects when a cost partition is optimal; it can deal with general cost functions; and it does not consider abstractions in the linear program that do not contribute to the heuristic value. We also show the advantage of the method empirically and investigate several improvements that are useful for all cost partitioning methods.

It is usually prohibitively expensive to recompute landmarks in every state of a heuristic search algorithm that bases its heuristic estimate on landmarks. Successful planning systems like LAMA compute landmarks just for the initial state instead and only keep track for each state encountered during search which landmarks of the initial state are accepted or required again. The LM-A* algorithm describes a similar idea for cost-optimal heuristic search. However, it lacks support for reasonable orderings, which have recently been shown to be informative when cyclic dependencies between landmarks are exploited in the heuristic computation. We propose the novel LM-BFS framework for best-first heuristic search with landmark-based heuristics which allows to describe a variety of algorithms in terms of five components: landmark generation, landmark graph progression, landmark graph merging, landmark graph extension, and exploration strategy. We use LM-BFS to show that considering reasonable orderings in the landmark graph progression component leads to flawed landmark graphs in LAMA , and propose a novel landmark graph extension that captures the same information flawlessly. We observe empirically that considering reasonable orderings in the extension rather than the progression component has a positive effect both for LAMA and for cost-optimal planning.

Saturated cost partitioning and post-hoc optimization are two powerful cost partitioning algorithms for optimal classical planning. The main idea of saturated cost partitioning is to give each considered heuristic only the fraction of remaining operator costs that it needs to prove its estimates. We show how to apply this idea to post-hoc optimization and obtain a heuristic that dominates the original both in theory and on the IPC benchmarks.

Cost partitioning is a method for admissibly combining admissible heuristics. In this work, we extend this concept to merge-and-shrink (M&S) abstractions that may use labels that do not directly correspond to operators. We investigate how optimal and saturated cost partitioning (SCP) interact with M&S transformations and develop a method to compute SCPs during the computation of M&S. Experiments show that SCP significantly improves M&S on standard planning benchmarks.

MDPs with factored action spaces, i.e. where actions are described as assignments to a set of action variables, allow reasoning over action variables instead of action states, yet most algorithms only consider a grounded action representation. This includes algorithms that are instantiations of the trial-based heuristic tree search (THTS) framework, such as AO* or UCT.

To be able to reason over factored action spaces, we propose a generalisation of THTS where nodes that branch over all applicable actions are replaced with subtrees that consist of nodes that represent the decision for a single action variable. We show that many THTS algorithms retain their theoretical properties under the generalised framework, and show how to approximate any state-action heuristic to a heuristic for partial action assignments. This allows to guide a UCT variant that is able to create exponentially fewer nodes than the same algorithm that considers ground actions. An empirical evaluation on the benchmark set of the probabilistic track of the latest International Planning Competition validates the benefits of the approach.

Cost partitioning is a method for admissibly combining a set of admissible heuristic estimators by distributing operator costs among the heuristics. Computing an optimal cost partitioning, i.e., the operator cost distribution that maximizes the heuristic value, is often prohibitively expensive to compute. Saturated cost partitioning is an alternative that is much faster to compute and has been shown to yield high-quality heuristics. However, its greedy nature makes it highly susceptible to the order in which the heuristics are considered. We propose a greedy algorithm to generate orders and show how to use hill-climbing search to optimize a given order. Combining both techniques leads to significantly better heuristic estimates than using the best random order that is generated in the same time. Since there is often no single order that gives good guidance on the whole state space, we use the maximum of multiple orders as a heuristic that is significantly better informed than any single-order heuristic, especially when we actively search for a set of diverse orders.

This paper investigates online stochastic planning for problems with large factored state and action spaces. One promising approach in recent work estimates the quality of applicable actions in the current state through aggregate simulation from the states they reach. This leads to significant speedup, compared to search over concrete states and actions, and suffices to guide decision making in cases where the performance of a random policy is informative of the quality of a state. The paper makes two significant improvements to this approach. The first, taking inspiration from lifted belief propagation, exploits the structure of the problem to derive a more compact computation graph for aggregate simulation. The second improvement replaces the random policy embedded in the computation graph with symbolic variables that are optimized simultaneously with the search for high quality actions. This expands the scope of the approach to problems that require deep search and where information is lost quickly with random steps. An empirical evaluation shows that these ideas significantly improve performance, leading to state of the art performance on hard planning problems.

The International Planning Competition 2018 consisted of several tracks on classical, temporal and probabilistic plan- ning. In this paper, we focus on the discrete MDP track of the probabilistic portion of the competition.

We discuss the changes to the input language RDDL, which give rise to new challenges for planning systems, and ana- lyze each of the eight competition domains separately and highlight unique properties. We demonstrate flaws of the used evaluation criterion, the IPC score, and discuss the need for optimal upper bounds. An evaluation of the three top- performers, including their post-competition versions, and a brief analysis of their performance highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the individual approaches.

The desire for persistent autonomy in ambitious robotic space missions has seen renewed interest in the use of on-board planning. This poses particular challenges in terms of the limited computational power of radiation-hardened hardware, and also the need to integrate with functions external to the planner itself. In this paper, we discuss the development of a forward-chaining temporal planner for use in this setting. We present results illustrating its lightweight resource footprint compared to contemporary planners, and its application to two proposed robotic space scenarios.

The European Robotic Goal-Oriented Autonomous Controller (ERGO) (http://www.h2020-ergo.eu) is one of the PERASPERA SRC first call projects. The focus of this project is to develop a framework for long-range autonomy that allows commanding a spacecraft via high-level goals. The developed ERGO framework achieves this aim by providing a new paradigm based on components and tools. Two main components, that include Artificial Intelligence technology, are at the core of ERGO: an on-board mission planner, able to dynamically generate plans on-board from high-level goals, and a scientific agent, that detects targets of interest from images. Additionally, other autonomous capabilities that can be used and tailored for different robotics platforms, such as rover navigation and robotic arm motion planning, are provided by ERGO. In this paper we discuss the results and performances achieved in the field tests of two applications developed with the ERGO framework: an orbital and a planetary mission.

ERGO (European Robotic Goal-Oriented Autonomous Controller) is one of the six space robotic projects in the frame of the first call of the PERASPERA SRC. ERGO is aimed to future space missions, in which space robots will require a higher level of autonomy (e.g. Exomars or Mars2020). As a framework, ERGO provides a set of components that can be reused and tailored for robots space missions (Orbital, Deep Space or Planetary Explorations) in which the on-board system has to work autonomously, performing complex operations in hazardous environments without human intervention. The concept of autonomy can be applied to a whole set of operations to be performed on-board with no human supervision, such as Martian exploration rovers, deep space probes, or in- orbit assembly robots. In the last decades, the advantages of increasing the level of autonomy in spacecraft have been demonstrated in planetary rovers. At the same time, orbital space missions have already successfully applied autonomy concepts on board, in particular for autonomous event detection and on-board activities planning.

ERGO provides a framework for on-board autonomy systems based on a specific paradigm aimed to facilitate an easy integration and/or expansion covering future mission needs; by using this paradigm, both reactive and deliberative capabilities can be orchestrated on-board. In ERGO, deliberative capabilities are provided via AI techniques: automated planning and machine-learning based vision systems. ERGO also provides a set of tools for developing safety-critical space mission applications and FDIR systems. Moreover, specific components for motion planning, path planning, hazard avoidance and trajectory control are also part of the framework. Finally, ERGO is integrated with the TASTE middleware. All ERGO components are now being tested in an orbital and a planetary scenario.

This paper discusses the ERGO components, its main characteristics, and how they have been applied to an orbital and a planetary scenario. It provides an overview of the evolution of the ERGO system; its main components and the future extensions planned for it.

We study the impact of tie-breaking on the behavior of greedy best-first search with a fixed state space and fixed heuristic. We prove that it is NP-complete to determine the number of states that need to be expanded by greedy best-first search in the best case or in the worst case. However, the best- and worst-case behavior can be computed in polynomial time for undirected state spaces. We perform computational experiments on benchmark tasks from the International Planning Competitions that compare the best and worst cases of greedy best-first search to FIFO, LIFO and random tie-breaking. The experiments demonstrate the importance of tie-breaking in greedy best-first search.

A classical result in optimal search shows that A* with an admissible and consistent heuristic expands every state whose f-value is below the optimal solution cost and no state whose f-value is above the optimal solution cost. For satisficing search algorithms, a similarly clear understanding is currently lacking. We examine the search behavior of greedy best-first search (GBFS) in order to make progress towards such an understanding.

The European Robotic Goal-Oriented Autonomous Controller ERGO is one of the six space robotic projects in the frame of the PERASPERA SRC. Its main objective is to provide an autonomous framework for future space robots that will be able to perform its activities without the need of constant human supervision and control. Future space missions, in particular those aimed at Deep Space or planetary exploration, such as Exomars, or Mars2020 demand a greater level of autonomy. The concept of autonomy applies here to a whole set of operations to be performed on-board without human supervision; for instance, a Martian rover has to avoid getting stuck in the sand while traversing, autonomously recharge its batteries periodically, and communicate with Earth occasionally each sol.

Additionally, it will need to be able to detect serendipitous events (e.g. a rock that has a specific property). A deep space probe has to take the right measurements to approach an asteroid, and due to the latency of the communication with Ground, these measurements need to be taken autonomously on board. Orbital space missions have already successfully applied autonomy concepts on board, in particular for autonomous event detection and on- board activities planning.

In ERGO we provide a framework for autonomy aimed to cover a wide set of a capabilities, ranging from reactive capabilities (i.e. capabilities that demand a quick response) to deliberative capabilities (that consider different courses of actions, and evaluate among the different possibilities the best alternative).

This paper will discuss the process of the design of robotic systems using the paradigm provided by this framework applied to two different scenarios: a Sample Fetching Rover (SFR), and also an On-Orbit Servicing mission, where a damaged spacecraft can have one or several of its modules replaced autonomously by a servicer spacecraft. We will describe the methodology, the main problems found, the design decisions taken to overcome these problems, as well as an overview of the final design of both systems.

The European Robotic Goal-Oriented Autonomous Controller ERGO (http://www.h2020-ergo.eu/) is one of the six space robotic projects in the frame of the PERASPERA SRC (http://www.h2020-peraspera.eu/). Its goal is to provide an Autonomy Framework capable of operating at different levels of autonomy, from tele- operations to full on-board autonomy. Even though it has been originally conceived for space robotics, its domain independent design facilitates its application to any terrestrial robotic system. This paper presents the approach followed, current status and future steps.

Cost partitioning is a general and principled approach for constructing additive admissible heuristics for state-space search. Cost partitioning approaches for optimal classical planning include optimal cost partitioning, uniform cost partitioning, zero-one cost partitioning, saturated cost partitioning, post-hoc optimization and the canonical heuristic for pattern databases. We compare these algorithms theoretically, showing that saturated cost partitioning dominates greedy zero-one cost partitioning. As a side effect of our analysis, we obtain a new cost partitioning algorithm dominating uniform cost partitioning. We also evaluate these algorithms experimentally on pattern databases, Cartesian abstractions and landmark heuristics, showing that saturated cost partitioning is usually the method of choice on the IPC benchmark suite.

A classical result in optimal search shows that A* with an admissible and consistent heuristic expands every state whose f-value is below the optimal solution cost and no state whose f-value is above the optimal solution cost. For satisficing search algorithms, a similarly clear understanding is currently lacking. We examine the search behaviour of greedy best-first search (GBFS) in order to make progress towards such an understanding. We introduce the concept of high-water mark benches, which separate the search space into areas that are searched by a GBFS algorithm in sequence. High-water mark benches allow us to exactly determine the set of states that are not expanded under any GBFS tie-breaking strategy. For the remaining states, we show that some are expanded by all GBFS searches, while others are expanded only if certain conditions are met.

We propose techniques for efficiently determining optimal solutions to large logistics planning domain problems. We map a problem instance to a directed graph and show that no more than one vehicle per weakly connected component of the graph is needed for an optimal solution. We propose techniques for efficiently finding the vehicles which must be employed for an optimal solution. Also we develop a strong admissible heuristic based on the analysis of a directed graph, the cycles of which represent situations in the problem state in which a vehicle must visit a location more than once. To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first method that determines optimal solutions for large logistics instances (including the largest instances in the IPC 1998 and IPC 2000 problem sets).

In classical planning, cost partitioning is a method for admissibly combining a set of heuristic estimators by distributing operator costs among the heuristics. An optimal cost partitioning is often prohibitively expensive to compute. Saturated cost partitioning is an alternative that is much faster to compute and has been shown to offer high-quality heuristic guidance on Cartesian abstractions. However, its greedy nature makes it highly susceptible to the order in which the heuristics are considered. We show that searching in the space of orders leads to significantly better heuristic estimates than with previously considered orders. Moreover, using multiple orders leads to a heuristic that is significantly better informed than any single-order heuristic. In experiments with Cartesian abstractions, the resulting heuristic approximates the optimal cost partitioning very closely.

Abstraction heuristics are a popular method to guide optimal search algorithms in classical planning. Cost partitionings allow to sum heuristic estimates admissibly by distributing action costs among the heuristics. We introduce state-dependent cost partitionings which take context information of actions into account, and show that an optimal state-dependent cost partitioning dominates its state-independent counterpart. We demonstrate the potential of our idea with a state-dependent variant of the recently proposed saturated cost partitioning, and show that it has the potential to improve not only over its state-independent counterpart, but even over the optimal state-independent cost partitioning. Our empirical results give evidence that ignoring the context of actions in the computation of a cost partitioning leads to a significant loss of information.

Extending the classical planning formalism with state-dependent action costs (SDAC) allows an up to exponentially more compact task encoding. Recent work proposed to use edge-valued multi-valued decision diagrams (EVMDDs) to represent cost functions, which allows to automatically detect and exhibit structure in cost functions and to make heuristic estimators accurately reflect SDAC. However, so far only the inadmissible additive heuristic has been considered in this context. In this paper, we define informative admissible abstraction heuristics which enable optimal planning with SDAC. We discuss how abstract cost values can be extracted from EVMDDs that represent concrete cost functions without adjusting them to the selected abstraction. Our theoretical analysis shows that this is efficiently possible for abstractions that are Cartesian or coarser. We adapt the counterexample-guided abstraction refinement approach to derive such abstractions. An empirical evaluation of the resulting heuristic shows that highly accurate values can be computed quickly.

This article presents an integrated robot system capable of interactive learning in dialogue with a human. Such a system needs to have several competencies and must be able to process different types of representations. In this article, we describe a collection of mechanisms that enable integration of heterogeneous competencies in a principled way. Central to our design is the creation of beliefs from visual and linguistic information, and the use of these beliefs for planning system behaviour to satisfy internal drives. The system is able to detect gaps in its knowledge and to plan and execute actions that provide information needed to fill these gaps. We propose a hierarchy of mechanisms which are capable of engaging in different kinds of learning interactions, e.g. those initiated by a tutor or by the system itself. We present the theory these mechanisms are build upon and an instantiation of this theory in the form of an integrated robot system. We demonstrate the operation of the system in the case of learning conceptual models of objects and their visual properties.

Most work in planning focuses on tasks with state-independent or even uniform action costs. However, supporting state-dependent action costs admits a more compact representation of many tasks. We investigate how to solve such tasks using heuristic search, with a focus on delete-relaxation heuristics. We first define a generalization of the additive heuristic to such tasks and then discuss different ways of computing it via compilations to tasks with state-independent action costs and more directly by modifying the relaxed planning graph. We evaluate these approaches theoretically and present an implementation of the generalized additive heuristic for planning with state-dependent action costs. To our knowledge, this gives rise to the first approach able to handle even the hardest instances of the combinatorial Academic Advising domain from the International Probabilistic Planning Competition (IPPC) 2014.

Supporting state-dependent action costs in planning admits a more compact representation of many tasks. We generalize the additive heuristic and compute it by embedding decision-diagram representations of action cost functions into the RPG. We give a theoretical evaluation and present an implementation of the generalized additive heuristic. This allows us to handle even the hardest instances of the combinatorial Academic Advising domain from the IPPC 2014.

We introduce the MDP-Evaluation Stopping Problem, the optimization problem faced by participants of the International Probabilistic Planning Competition 2014 that focus on their own performance. It can be constructed as a meta-MDP where actions correspond to the application of a policy on a base-MDP, which is intractable in practice. Our theoretical analysis reveals that there are tractable special cases where the problem can be reduced to an optimal stopping problem. We derive approximate strategies of high quality by relaxing the general problem to an optimal stopping problem, and show both theoretically and experimentally that it not only pays off to pursue luck in the execution of the optimal policy, but that there are even cases where it is better to be lucky than good as the execution of a suboptimal base policy is part of an optimal strategy in the meta-MDP.

Domain-independent planning in general is broadly applicable to a wide range of tasks. Many formalisms exist that allow to describe different aspects of realistic problems. Which one is best is not clear as usually more expressiveness comes with a cost in planning time. Under the assumption that hard guarantees are not required, users are faced with a decision between multiple approaches. In this work we study the effect of nondeterministic action outcomes. As a generic model we use a probabilistic description in the form of Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). We define abstracting translations into a classical planning formalism and fully observable nondeterministic (FOND) planning. Our goal is to give insight into how state-of-the-art systems perform on different MDP planning domains. We evaluate those MDPs by running state-of-the-art planning systems on the abstracted formalisms.

In General Game Playing, a player receives the rules of an unknown game and attempts to maximize his expected reward. Since 2011, the GDL-II rule language extension allows the formulation of nondeterministic and partially observable games. In this paper, we present an algorithm for such games, with a focus on the single-player case. Conceptually, at each stage, the proposed Norns algorithm distinguishes between the past, present and future steps of the game. More specifically, a belief state tree is used to simulate a potential past that leads to a present that is consistent with received observations. Unlike other related methods, our method is asymptotically optimal. Moreover, augmenting the belief state tree with iteratively improved probabilities speeds up the process over time significantly. As this allows a true picture of the present, we additionally present an optimal version of the well-known UCT algorithm for partially observable single-player games. Instead of performing hindsight optimization on a simplified, fully observable tree, the true future is simulated on an action-observation tree that takes partial observability into account. The expected reward estimates of applicable actions converge towards the true expected rewards even for moves that are only used to gather information. We prove that our algorithm is asymptotically optimal for single-player games and POMDPs and support our claim with an empirical evaluation.

Successful heuristic search planners for satisficing planning like FF or LAMA are usually based on one or more best first search techniques. Recent research has led to planners like Arvand, Roamer or Probe, where novel techniques like Monte-Carlo Random Walks extend the traditional exploitation-focused best first search by an exploration component. The UCT algorithm balances these contradictory incentives and has shown tremendous success in related areas of sequential decision making but has never been applied to classical planning yet. We make up for this shortcoming by applying the Trial-based Heuristic Tree Search framework to classical planning. We show how to model the best first search techniques Weighted A* and Greedy Best First Search with only three ingredients: action selection, initialization and backup function. Then we use THTS to derive four versions of the UCT algorithm that differ in the used backup functions. The experimental evaluation shows that our main algorithm, GreedyUCT*, outperforms all other algorithms presented in this paper, both in terms of coverage and quality.

Dynamic programming is a well-known approach for solving MDPs. In large state spaces, asynchronous versions like Real-Time Dynamic Programming (RTDP) have been applied successfully. If unfolded into equivalent trees, Monte-Carlo Tree Search algorithms are a valid alternative. UCT, the most popular representative, obtains good anytime behavior by guiding the search towards promising areas of the search tree and supporting non-admissible heuristics. The global Heuristic Search algorithm AO* finds optimal solutions for MDPs that can be represented as acyclic AND/OR graphs.

Despite the differences, these approaches actually have much in common. We present the Trial-based Heuristic Tree Search (THTS) framework that subsumes these approaches and distinguishes them based on five ingredients: heuristic function, backup function, action selection, outcome selection, and trial length. We describe the ingredients that model RTDP, AO* and UCT within this framework, and use THTS to combine attributes of these algorithms step by step in order to derive novel algorithms with superior theoretical properties. We merge Full Bellman and Monte-Carlo backup functions to Partial Bellman backups, and gain a function that both allows partial updates and a procedure that labels states when they are solved. DP-UCT combines attributes and theoretical properties from RTDP and UCT even though it differs from the latter only in the used Partial Bellman backups. Our main algorithm, UCT* adds a limited trial length to DP-UCT to inherit the global search behavior of AO*, which ensures that parts of the state space that are closer to the root are investigated more thoroughly. The experimental evaluation shows that both DP-UCT and UCT* are not only superior to UCT, but also outperform PROST, the winner of the International Probabilistic Planning Competition (IPPC) 2011 on the benchmarks of IPPC 2011.

Dynamic programming is a well-known approach for solving MDPs. In large state spaces, asynchronous versions like Real-Time Dynamic Programming have been applied successfully. If unfolded into equivalent trees, Monte-Carlo Tree Search algorithms are a valid alternative. UCT, the most popular representative, obtains good anytime behavior by guiding the search towards promising areas of the search tree. The Heuristic Search algorithm AO* finds optimal solutions for MDPs that can be represented as acyclic AND/OR graphs.

We introduce a common framework, Trial-based Heuristic Tree Search, that subsumes these approaches and distinguishes them based on five ingredients: heuristic function, backup function, action selection, outcome selection, and trial length. Using this framework, we describe three new algorithms which mix these ingredients in novel ways in an attempt to combine their different strengths. Our evaluation shows that two of our algorithms not only provide superior theoretical properties to UCT, but also outperform state-of-the-art approaches experimentally.

We present PROST, a probabilistic planning system that is based on the UCT algorithm by Kocsis and Szepesvari (2006), which has been applied successfully to many areas of planning and acting under uncertainty. The objective of this paper is to show the application of UCT to domain-independent probabilistic planning, an area it had not been applied to before. We furthermore present several enhancements to the algorithm, including a method that is able to drastically reduce the branching factor by identifying superfluous actions. We show how search depth limitation leads to a more thoroughly investigated search space in parts that are influential on the quality of a policy, and present a sound and polynomially computable detection of reward locks, states that correspond to, e.g., dead ends or goals. We describe a general Q-value initialization for unvisited nodes in the search tree that circumvents the initial random walks inherent to UCT, and leads to a faster convergence on average. We demonstrate the significant influence of the enhancements by providing a comparison on the IPPC benchmark domains.

The control of dynamic systems, which aims to minimize the deviation of state variables from reference values in a continuous state space, is a central domain of cybernetics and control theory. The objective of action planning is to find feasible state trajectories in a discrete state space from an initial state to a state satisfying the goal conditions, which in principle addresses the same issue on a more abstract level. We combine these approaches to switch between dynamic system characteristics on the fly, and to generate control input sequences that affect both discrete and continuous state variables. Our approach (called Domain Predictive Control) is applicable to hybrid systems with linear dynamics and discretizable inputs.

In recent years, domain-independent planning has been applied to a rising number of real-world applications. Usually, the description language of choice is PDDL. However, PDDL is not suited to model all challenges imposed by real-world applications. Dornhege et al. proposed semantic attachments to allow the computation of Boolean fluents by external processes called modules during planning. To acquire state information from the planning system a module developer must perform manual requests through a callback interface which is both inefficient and error-prone.

In this paper, we present the Object-oriented Planning Language OPL, which incorporates the structure and advantages of modern object-oriented programming languages. We demonstrate how a domain-specific module interface that allows to directly access the planner state using object member functions is automatically gen- erated from an OPL planning task. The generated domain-specific interface allows for a safe and less error-prone implementation of modules. We show experimentally that this interface is more efficient than the PDDL-based module interface of TFD/M.

In this paper we present representations and mechanisms that facilitate continuous learning of visual concepts in dialogue with a tutor and show the implemented robot system. We present how beliefs about the world are created by processing visual and linguistic information and show how they are used for planning system behaviour with the aim at satisfying its internal drive -- to extend its knowledge. The system facilitates different kinds of learning initiated by the human tutor or by the system itself. We demonstrate these principles in the case of learning about object colours and basic shapes.

Most predominant approaches in probabilistic planning utilize techniques from the more thoroughly investigated field of classical planning by determinizing the problem at hand. In this paper, we present a method to map probabilistic operators to an equivalent set of probabilistic operators in a novel normal form, requiring polynomial time and space. From this, we directly derive a determinization which can be used for, \eg, replanning strategies incorporating a classical planning system. Unlike previously described all outcome determinizations, the number of deterministic operators is not exponentially but polynomially bounded in the number of parallel probabilistic effects, enabling the use of more sophisticated determinization-based techniques in the future.

In the DESIRE project an autonomous robot capable of performing service tasks in a typical kitchen environment has been developed. The overall system consists of various loosely coupled subcomponents providing particular features like manipulating objects or recognizing and interacting with humans. To bring all these subcomponents together to act as monolithic system, a high-performance planning system has been implemented. In this paper, we present this system’s basic architecture and some advanced extensions necessary to cope with the various challenges arising in dynamic and uncertain environments like those a real world service robot is usually faced with.

We consider the stochastic variant of the Canadian Traveler's Problem, a path planning problem where adverse weather can cause some roads to be untraversable. The agent does not initially know which roads can be used. However, it knows a probability distribution for the weather, and it can observe the status of roads incident to its location. The objective is to find a policy with low expected travel cost.

We introduce and compare several algorithms for the stochastic CTP. Unlike the optimistic approach most commonly considered in the literature, the new approaches we propose take uncertainty into account explicitly. We show that this property enables them to generate policies of much higher quality than the optimistic one, both theoretically and experimentally.

When using a planner-based agent architecture, many things can go wrong. First and foremost, an agent might fail to execute one of the planned actions for some reasons. Even more annoying, however, is a situation where the agent is incompetent, i.e., unable to come up with a plan. This might be due to the fact that there are principal reasons that prohibit a successful plan or simply because the task's description is incomplete or incorrect. In either case, an explanation for such a failure would be very helpful. We will address this problem and provide a formalization of coming up with excuses for not being able to find a plan. Based on that, we will present an algorithm that is able to find excuses and demonstrate that such excuses can be found in practical settings in reasonable time.

We consider the stochastic variant of the Canadian Traveler's Problem, a path planning problem where adverse weather can cause some roads to be untraversable. The agent does not initially know which roads can be used. However, it knows a probability distribution for the weather, and it can observe the status of roads incident to its location. The objective is to find a policy with low expected travel cost.

We introduce and compare several algorithms for the stochastic CTP. Unlike the optimistic approach most commonly considered in the literature, the new approaches we propose take uncertainty into account explicitly. We show that this property enables them to generate policies of much higher quality than the optimistic one, both theoretically and experimentally.

Solving real-world problems using symbolic planning often requires a simplified formulation of the original problem, since certain subproblems cannot be represented at all or only in a way leading to inefficiency. For example, manipulation planning may appear as a subproblem in a robotic planning context or a packing problem can be part of a logistics task. In this paper we propose an extension of PDDL for specifying semantic attachments. This allows the evaluation of grounded predicates as well as the change of fluents by externally specified functions. Furthermore, we describe a general schema of integrating semantic attachments into a forward-chaining planner and report on our experience of adding this extension to the planners FF and Temporal Fast Downward. Finally, we present some preliminary experiments using semantic attachments.

In recent years, researchers started to study the game of Skat. The strength of existing Skat playing programs is definitely the card play phase. The bidding phase, however, was treated quite poorly so far. This is a severe drawback since bidding abilities influence the overall playing performance drastically. In this paper we present a powerful bidding engine which is based on a k-nearest neighbor algorithm.